E-Mail: johannes.nagel@uni-bielefeld.de
Doctoral Project: The US Military during the Global Transformation, 1865-1905
02/2019 - 05/2019 | Doctoral Fellow at the German Historical Institute, Washington D.C. |
Since 10/2017 | Doctoral Researcher in the Research Training Group "World Politics", Bielefeld University |
03/2017 | Internship, Department Central State Archives of Stuttgart |
11/2016 | State Examination in History, Political Science and Philosophy |
04/2014 - 11/2016 | Student, Heidelberg University |
08/2012 - 05/2013 | Exchange student and teaching assistant, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA |
04/2011 - 07/2012 | Tutor, International Office, Tübingen University |
07/2010 - 12/2010 | Assistant, Baden-Württemberg State Archive, Stuttgart |
09/2009 - 07/2012 | Student, Tübingen University |
09/2008 - 08/2009 | Internship, Archive of the Centrum Judaicum/New Synagogue Foundation, Berlin |
Why did the American state in the late 19th century abandon its traditional politics of anti-militarism and began to prepare for war in peacetime?
After the Civil War, a movement formed within the American military that wanted the armed forces to rationalize and assume a greater role in the world and the nation. Early efforts of this reform movement were met with indifference, as the government quickly dismantled the wartime military and relegated its officers to political isolation. Toward the end of the century, however, America caught up with European military modernization, building a new navy and expanding the army, thus preparing for future conflicts. This research project will investigate why this change from anti-militarism to militarism occurred.
The proposed hypothesis is that this development was caused by changes in how the American state observed world politics. After 1865, military professionals looked to European states for models to fear and follow, whereas the public and the civilian state had little interest in global power politics. The "shrinking of the world" had contradictory effects on the United States, strengthening both anti-militaristic globalism as well as "Realpolitik" nationalism within different segments of the state. Only when these different modes of observation began to align did a political consensus emerge and reforms became possible.
This research project contributes to the study of political development by showing how the uniquely American relationship between the military and the civilian state resulted in a bifurcated view of world politics. This will relate domestic developments to changes in world politics. Bringing the often-neglected case of American history into the discussion of state formation and world politics will add a new perspective to debates on comparisons and global entanglements. This project will draw on historiographic primary source analysis as well as methods from qualitative process-analytic political science.